Awaab's Law compliance
For Claims Management Companies
Stop paying for leads your panel will reject.Vet them properly first.
Upload the case pack. EWLPS parses the correspondence, checks the statutory 12-week notice period, cross-references Grand v Gill where it applies, and runs eleven HDR checks including Awaab's Law and Section 11 compliance. CMCs receive a risk-rated PDF in minutes, not a summary that calls a letter “about damp.”
- 11
- HDR criteria per file
- <5
- Minutes to report
- UK
- Data hosted in London
Vetting process
LiveHDR_Claim_Pack_2026.pdf
Uploaded · 2.4 MB · Complete
Eleven HDR checks (scored)
- 01Awaab's Law compliancePass
- 02Statutory 12-week notice periodPass
- 03Section 11 repair obligationsPass
- 04Structural defect classificationPass
- 05Causation & Grand v Gill indicatorsPass
- 06Limitation period checkPass
- 07Evidence sufficiency for instructionPass
- 08Vulnerability & harm factorsPass
- 09Pre-action protocol compliancePass
- 10Quantum & Part 35 indicatorsPass
- 11Overall risk rating (Green / Amber / Red)Pass
Vetting outcome
File cleared for panel referral.
What the panel will ask. EWLPS checks it first.
Scroll →
Statutory 12-week notice period
Section 11 repair obligations
Structural defect classification
Causation & Grand v Gill indicators
Limitation period check
Evidence sufficiency for instruction
Vulnerability & harm factors
Pre-action protocol compliance
Quantum & Part 35 indicators
Overall risk rating (Green / Amber / Red)
Awaab's Law compliance
Statutory 12-week notice period
Section 11 repair obligations
Structural defect classification
Causation & Grand v Gill indicators
Limitation period check
Evidence sufficiency for instruction
Vulnerability & harm factors
Pre-action protocol compliance
Quantum & Part 35 indicators
Overall risk rating (Green / Amber / Red)
30+
Years inside UK solicitor firms, HDR since 2013
Shaine Stead
Shaine Stead has instructed hundreds of HDR claims to trial. EWLPS applies the vetting he wished CMCs had sent on day one.
“Your panel does not reject files because the damp photograph was blurry. They reject them because the legal structure is wrong.”
Clio, Lawhive, and the rest will summarise your documents. EWLPS reads them like a litigator: limitation dates, pre-action protocol steps, quantum indicators, vulnerability flags, and whether the tenant lifestyle argument will hold. That is the difference between a referral that lands and a lead you should have dropped at intake.
2013
HDR-only since
100s
Claims to trial verdict
11
Checks per file
UK-hosted case data
AWS London (eu-west-2). Case data does not leave the UK. Georgie Stead signs off EWLPS UK GDPR controls. No US data centres. No training on uploaded files.
Litigation logic, not summaries
Built from HDR practice outwards. Parses letters, checks statutory notice, flags structural defects, and scores quantum indicators. Not a wrapper that labels a PDF "housing correspondence."
Stop wasting lead spend
One token, one vet, priced in Pound Sterling. No monthly licence. EWLPS vets before referral, not after the panel sends the file back.
app.ewlps.co.uk
Run the next file through litigation-grade vetting.
Register an organisation, buy tokens in Pound Sterling, and upload a case pack. EWLPS returns a risk-rated report within minutes so CMCs can refer with confidence or drop weak leads before budget is burned.